Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 Ind. 431

Noble's v. Noble

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1862

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1862-11-15

<p>Since 1853, upon the death of a wife, testate or intestate, leaving a widower, he is entitled to one-third of her estate, both real and personal, subject to his proportion of the debts of the wife contracted before marriage.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1862-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1916

7 state decisions

20186218701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Perkins, J.

¶1Emily II Noble, the wife of James Noble, departed this life, testate, leaving personal property, hers separately, of considerable value.

¶2James Noble, her widower, applied to the Common Pleas Court of the proper county, for direction to the executrix of Emily H. Noble, deceased, to pay to him the value of one-third of the personal estate above mentioned, subject, etc., left by the said Emily. James Noble took nothing under the will. The direction was given, and, we think, rightly.

¶3By the common law, and the law of Indiana, prior to 1853, the husband acquired all the personal property of the wife, by marriage. Her personal estate, and the use of her real estate, came, upon marriage, into the common stock for the benefit of the family.

¶4But, since 1853, her real estate, the income from it, and her personal estate, existing at the marriage, and that acquired by descent, devise or gift, afterward, remain hers, and she is not obliged to appropriate any of it to the support of the family. But if she dies before her husband, then one-third of her estate, real and personal, goes to him, without regard to any will which the wife may have made. This is the express language of the statute. 1 G. & H., p. 295.

Per Curiam.

¶5The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

/19/ind/431 · .json · Public domain