BAROCIO’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2013
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang · Molinaro v. New Jersey · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Bagamasbad · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Phinpathya · Balani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“their last known address, the male respondent's last known place of employment, the postal service, the California Department of Motor Vehicles, and the local gas and telephone companies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bhasin v. Gonzales“return receipts signed by both the male respondent [Barocio] and the office of his prior attorney which verify that they received the notice to report.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bhasin v. Gonzales“disregard the order of deportation against them by refusing to report on their appointed date of departure”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Bhasin v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.