19 I. & N. Dec. 302 - LINNAS’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · Topsy's International, Inc. v. Seiffer · Humble Pipe Line Co. v. Waggonner · Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers · Lynum v. State of Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he language of that section expressly requires, or has been construed to require, that the `government' of a country selected under any of the three steps must indicate it is willing to accept a deported alien into its `territory'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a `government' in the sense of a political organization that exercises power on behalf of the people subjected to its jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ali v. Ashcroft“a foreign place with `territory' in a geographical sense,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ali v. Ashcroft
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.