Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 I&NDEC 377 - VELASQUEZ

VELASQUEZ’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
February 2024
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Hoodho v. Holder (2009), Lovell v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1995)

15 federal appellate ·

27019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1325 (§ 275 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza · United States Bilokumsky v. Tod · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Elvira Magallanes-Damian v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Monica Gallegos-Ares v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Marisol Montero v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Candalaria Garcia-Quesada v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Jose Gallegos-Arrez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Engracia Saucedo-De Gallegos v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Lucia Solis De Garcia v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Trias-Hernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[D]ocumentary evidence in deportation proceedings need not comport with the strict judicial rules of evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.