AURELIO’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2020
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1181 (§ 211 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Te Kuei Liu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“should have ascertained in the exercise of reasonable diligence the impact of her father's death on her eligibility for an immigrant visa.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Singh v. Gonzales“people living in remote Philippine villages,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Singh v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.