Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 I&NDEC 502 - A-G

A-G’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2023
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2023

10 federal appellate ·

13019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Bagamasbad · Mabry v. Johnson · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Rios-Pineda

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to the long-accepted position that it is not persecution for a country to require military service of its citizens.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the respondent himself was recruited by a friend to be an oreja, or spy, for the government”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.