Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 I&NDEC 57 - FEDORENKO

FEDORENKO’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2019
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2019 · most notably Negusie v. Holder (2009), Carlos Humberto Ordonez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2003)

21 federal appellate ·

2301984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Yates v. United States · Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath · United States v. Mendoza · International Ass'n of Machinists v. Duckworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an appellate body whose function is to review, not to create, a record,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]ll evidence which is pertinent to determinations made during deportation proceedings, such as the determination of the respondent's eligibility for suspension of deportation, must be adduced in the hearing before the immigration judge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.