GRIJALVA’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2024
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 802 (§ 102 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza · Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · United States v. Herrera-Medina · Reid v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although ... police reports here are hearsay in nature, this does not mean that they are inadmissible in the respondent's deportation proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perez v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.