Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 Johns. 342

Ford v. Stuart

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1822

New York Supreme Court · decided 1822-01-15

THIS was an action of assumpsit on a promissory note, dated July 12, 1817, made by the defendant, for two hun¿re(j ¡Jotlars, payable to Obadiah Ford, or bearer, on the 5th day of February, 1818, with interest. The cause was tried at the Ontario circuit, in June, 1821, before Mr. Justice Yates. The plaintiff proved the transfer of the note to one 1 1 # Vanderbilt, on the 16th of April, 1818, and by Vanderbilt to him, soon after.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1822-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1891

11 state decisions

3018221830184018501860187018801890decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Two questions were made : 1st, Whether the assignee" of the judgment had a right to set it off, against the note, if the judgment had been legally assigned ? 2. Whether, as in this case, a judgment can be assigned by writing without seal. On the first point, it appeals that when the defendant purchased the judgment, Obadiah Ford then held this note, as payee, against the defendant, as maker; and it was not endorsed to the plaintiff, until several months after it was due. The plaintiff, therefore, took the note subject to all equity. We think the case of Tuttle v. Beebee, (8 Johns. Rep. 152.) is decisive of the right to set-off this judgment, in favor of the" assignee. The only difference is, that, in that case, a bond was assigned, and in this, a judgment. We, are, also, clearly of opinion, that a judgment may be assigned without a seal. When we speak of it, in regard to its assignable quality, it is a mere chose'in action, The set-off was, therefore, properly allowed ; and the plaintiff is entitled to judgment for the balance only, according to the verdict.

¶2New trial refused.

/19/johns/342 · .json · Public domain