19 Kan. App. 2d 528 - State v. Flanagan’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2020
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pollard v. United States · City of Overland Park v. Barron · 16 Kan. App. 2d 784 - State v. Aleman · Hendrix v. Consolidated Van Lines, Inc. · 15 Kan. App. 2d 674 - State v. Zirkle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““K.S.A. 20-1203 was not complied with. The entire transcript of the conversation which led to die contempt citation is set forth above. The trial judge, at the time he declared defendant in contempt, did not specify the conduct constituting such contempt. There is no statement of ‘whatever defense or extenuation die accused offered thereto.’ The journal entry filed to codify the conviction is perfunctory and it does not specify the grounds or set forth any defense offered. . . . “Our Supreme Court has held that a conviction for contempt which does not comply with K.S.A. 20-1203 is not merely reversible, it is void. In re Gambrell, 160 Kan. 620 , 164 P.2d 122 (1945); Wallace v. Weber, 134 Kan. 201 , Syl. ¶ 1, 5 P.2d 855 (1931). In Gambrell , the court said: ‘The order of die court on the contempt proceedings contains no statement of the conduct constituting the contempt, neidier does it contain a statement of whatever defense or extenuation die accused offered thereto. These matters are jurisdictional and the absence of them renders die order void. (See Wallace v. Weber, 134 Kan. 201 , 5 P.2d 855 , and cases cited therein.)’ 160 Kan. at 623 .” 19 Kan. App. 2d at 532-33 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he judicial system is an integral part of American life, and a criminal contempt conviction cannot help but affect a defendant's life if he or she appears before a judge who becomes aware of that conviction. That fact, and other possible collateral consequences of this conviction, are too obvious to declare this appeal moot simply because defendant cannot be subjected to additional jail time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lamb
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.