Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 McCanless 445 - Barr v. Charley

Barr v. Charley’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
November 2004
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2004

8 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

7019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schwartz v. Johnson · 2 Smith & H. 633 - Keller v. State · 38 Tenn. App. 55 - Carney v. Goodman · Main Street Transfer & Storage Co. v. Smith · 37 Tenn. App. 421 - Strickland Transp. Co. v. Douglas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The evidence tends to show negligence on the part of both of the drivers, but the negligence of one or both of them, while it is a factor, is not the primary factor to consider. The main issue in this case is the proximate causation of the accident; for where there is an accident and one or both of the parties are negligent the issue of proximate causation is usually for the jury. Standridge v. Godsey, 189 Tenn. 522 , 226 S.W.2d 277 (1949); Thompson v. Jarrett, 44 Tenn.App. 513 , 315 S.W.2d 537 (1957); Colwell v. Jones, 48 Tenn.App. 353 , 346 S.W.2d 450 (1960); Chandler v. Nolen, 50 Tenn. App. 49 , 359 S.W.2d 591 (1961). It was, then, proper for the trial court to submit the consideration of proximate causation to the jury.” Barr v. Charley, 215 Tenn. 452 , 387 S.W.2d 617 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.