Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 Md. App. 507 - Stanley v. State

19 Md. App. 507 - Stanley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

133
cited by 133 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
21
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 113 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 133 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2013 · most notably Illinois v. Gates (1983), State v. Novembrino (1987)

12 federal appellate · 113 state decisions — followed in 21 states

82019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Brinegar v. United States · Chimel v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 133 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and how did that third person come by the knowledge?'). The judge must ascertain the source for the raw data — the product of someone's senses — and then weigh that data for himself. He is concerned not with that part of an affidavit or testimony which provides information about the informant but with the recitation of the story coming from the informant.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “a casual rumor circulating in the underworld or an accusation based merely on an individual's general reputation”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. ““The Trustworthiness of Hearsay I. The Basis of Knowledge Prong II. The Veracity Prong A. The Credibility Spur B. The Reliability Spur.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.