¶1There was no irregularity on the face of either note to put plaintiff on notice that there were any restrictions surrounding the delivery of the notes, nor is there any proof that plaintiff had knowledge thereof.
¶2The order denying summary judgment to plaintiff should be reversed, and summary judgment directed in favor of plaintiff, with $10 costs.
¶3Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.
¶4Order reversed, etc.