Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 Mo. 339

Ex parte Skaggs

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1854

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1854-01-15

The petition stated that an election of sheriff was held in August, 1852, at which the petitioner, and Samuel Hadley, who was constitutionally ineligible, were.the only candidates ; that the number of votes polled was 1217, of which 778 were illegally cast for said Hadley, and 439 were legally cast for the petitioner.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1854-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1980

6 state decisions

2018541860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gamble, Judge,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2Skaggs applied to the Circuit Court of Clay county, for a mandamus to the clerk of the county court, requiring him to issue to Skaggs a certificate of his election as sheriff of that county. The Circuit Court refused to issue the mandamus, and Skaggs appeared before the clerk of the Circuit Court, and prayed an appeal to this court.

¶31. When a mandamus issues and is returned, the person obtaining the writ may require the judgment of the court upon the sufficiency of the return, or he may, under our statute, traverse the return, and thus produce an issue of fact. When the Circuit Court pronounces its judgment upon the questions of law and fact arising upon the return, and awards or refuses *340a peremptory mandamus, there is a judgment between parties which may be reviewed here, either upon an appeal or writ of error. But neither an appeal nor writ of error lies to the refusal of a circuit court to issue a mandamus upon the application of a petitioner. This was settled in Shrever et al. v. Livingston County, 9 Mo. Rep. 196.

¶4The appeal of Skaggs will be dismissed,

with the concurrence of the other judges.
/19/mo/339 · .json · Public domain