Luft v. Steamboat Envoy

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶21. The act concerning boats and vessels makes certain classes of demands liens, and authorizes proceedings against boats for their collection. The first class comprehends demands £ £ for wages due to hands or persons employed on board the boat or vessel, for work done or services performed on board the same.”

¶3When a suit is instituted against a boat upon a demand for labor, whether the suit be before a justice of the peace or before a court, it should appear by the demand, as filed, that the same is a lien which, under the statute, is to be enforced against the boat. In the present case, the plaintiff claims a small sum for labor performed, under an employment by the mate of the boat, but it does not appear that the labor was performed on board of the boat, nor, indeed, what the character of the service was. The defendant moved to dismiss the case, because. *478the demand was not brought within the statute authorizing proceedings against the boat, but this motion was overruled. Afterwards, the law commissioner arrested the judgment, because of this defect in the statement of the plaintiff’s demand. The motion to dismiss the case should have been sustained, because the demand of the plaintiff, as filed, did not appear to be one authorizing a suit against the boat, and although the motion in arrest of judgment is a novel motion in a suit commenced before a justice of the peace, yet it is at least as favorable to the plaintiff as the dismissal of his suit. If this court should reverse the judgment and remand the cause, with direction to dismiss it, no advantage would accrue to the plaintiff from such course. The judgment of the law commissioner will be affirmed.