State v. Probert’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2011
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Noland · Covey v. Cannon · Mayer & Lowenstein v. Chattahoochee National Bank · Staab v. Atlantic & P. R. · Territory of New Mexico v. Heacock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To allege that a person fraudulently embezzled and converted to his own use the money of another, is to allege that he so did with intent to defraud. To do an act fraudulently is to do it with intent to cheat and defraud.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nance
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.