James v. Hood’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
2 district · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 2005 · most notably State v. Garcia (1914), Fullen v. Fullen (1915)
2 district · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Block v. Darling · Goldenberg v. Law · United States v. Cook · Walsh v. . Kelly · Territory of New Mexico v. Leslie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"where it clearly appears that the jury have failed to respond truly to the real merits of the controversy, and justice has not been done, he should unhesitatingly set the verdict aside.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““A ruling on the admissibility of evidence, to which *no exception has been taken will not be considered on appeal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Starr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.