Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 NM 414 - State v. Garcia

State v. Garcia’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

220
cited by 220 later decisions
4
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

220 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 220 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably State v. Cunningham (2000), State v. Barber (2004)

220 state decisions

490191419201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clarke v. State · Hubbard v. State · James v. Hood · Territory of New Mexico v. Emilio · Mahoney v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 220 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ s- * * Only where some fundamental right has been invaded, and never in aid of strictly legal, technical, or unsubstantial claims; nor will we consider the weight of evidence if any substantial evidence was submitted to support the verdict. If substantial justice has been done, parties must have duly taken and preserved exceptions in the lower court to the invasion of their legal right before we will notice them here.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “There exists in every court ... an inherent power to see that a man’s fundamental rights are protected in every ease. Where a man’s fundamental rights have been violated, while he may be precluded by the terms of the statute or the rules of appellate procedure from insisting in this court upon relief from the same, this court has the power, in its discretion, to relieve him and to see that injustice is not done.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “not only no evidence ... to support the verdict, but the evidence established, conclusively, that he was innocent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.