Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 NY 330 - Kimberly v. . Patchin

Kimberly v. . Patchin’s Empirical Analysis

1859

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
23
states following
November 1957
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1957 · most notably Dows v. National Exchange Bank (1875), Geoghegan Sons & Co. v. Arbuckle Bros. (1924)

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 52 state decisions — followed in 23 states

13018591860187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But it is surely competent for the vendor to say in terms, that he waives that right, and that the purchaser shall become at once the legal owner of the number of gallons or bushels embraced in the sale. If he cannot say this effectually, then the reason must be that two men cannot be owners of separate quantities or proportions of an undistinguishable mass. That conclusion would be a naked absurdity, and I have shown that such is not the law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is a rule asserted in many legal authorities, but which, may be quite as fitly called a rule of reason and logic as of law, that in order to an executed sale, so as to transfer a title from one party to another, the thing sold must be ascertained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.