Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 Ohio App. 2d 204 - State v. Biedenharn

19 Ohio App. 2d 204 - State v. Biedenharn’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2022

7 state decisions

201969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 95 Ohio App. 107 - State v. Steele · City of South Euclid v. Clapacs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In all cases not provided by sections 2935.02 to 2935.08, inclusive, of the Revised Code, in order to cause the arrest or prosecution of a person charged with committing an offense in this state, a peace officer, or a private citizen having knowledge of the facts, shall file with the judge or clerk of a court of record, or with a magistrate, an affidavit charging the offense committed * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““There is no method established by statute to test the knowledge of an affiant about the facts preliminary to the filing of the affidavit. The Legislature has provided such a procedure where a search warrant is sought, * * * but such applies only thereto.” Id. at 206 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Personal knowledge of the commission of an offense is not a prerequisite to the filing of an affidavit therefor under Section 2935.09, Eevised Code, which provides for accusation by affidavit to cause arrest for prosecution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.