← 19 Ohio App. 2d 234 - State v. Williams

19 Ohio App. 2d 234 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

cited by 39 later decisions

states following

November 2016

most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably State v. Lytle (1976), State v. Jackson (1980)

39 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Brulotte Et Al. v. Thys Company · United States v. Paroutian · United States ex rel. Weber v. Ragen · Stein v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““It has frequently been held that a defendant’s right to be present at his trial depends upon whether the proceedings involve questions of law only or proceedings in which testimony of witnesses is received. Courts generally hold that defendant’s presence is required when testimony of witnesses is received, but under certain circumstances when matters of law are being argued before the court, such as preliminary pre-trial motions which do not affect substantial rights of the defendant, defendant’s presence is not required.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 8 Ohio App. 3d 56 - State v. Woods
“[A] hearing on a motion to suppress evidence, at which testimony of a witness is received, whether held before or during the trial of a case, is such a part of a trial as to require the presence of the accused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Michael Grace

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.