¶1 concurring. The foundation of the defendant’s position is his claim to “a reasonable expectation of privacy.”
¶2 In response thereto, I supplement my enthusiastic agreement with all Judge Milligan has written for our court with the observations that the Fourth Amendment, relative -to unreasonable searches, is not the only part of the Constitution of the United States; that if “equal protection” of the law and the “privileges and immunities” of federal citizenship are to be more than high sounding but empty phrases, then law-abiding citizens must have some “reasonable expectation” that they and their children may enter a place of public accommodation free from fear of being gunned down by a previously concealed weapon; that if “victims’ rights” is to be more than an empty legislative/media-hype slogan, then there must exist some minimal right of the law-abiding citizen not to become a victim in the first place; and, accordingly, the government must have some minimal obligation to take reasonable measures to breathe life into that expectation; so that the government’s conduct on the facts of this case is reasonable in light of the foregoing.
¶3 A man’s truck stop is not his castle.