Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 Ohio App. 3d 45 - Willis v. Willis

19 Ohio App. 3d 45 - Willis v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
3
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably Hoyt v. Hoyt (1990), 110 Ohio App. 3d 615 - Donovan v. Donovan (1996)

55 state decisions

22019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cherry v. Cherry · Berish v. Berish · Wolfe v. Wolfe · Briganti v. Briganti · Lewis v. President of the Bank of Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A flat rule to determine value cannot be established as equity depends on the totality of the circumstances. However, the court does have broad discretion to develop some measure of value. The trial court is not privileged to omit valuation altogether. A party's failure to put on any evidence does not permit assigning an unknown as value. The court itself should instruct the parties to submit evidence on the matter.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “*** the trial court erred by not placing a value on Mr. Mochko's pension benefits based on probable eligible dates of commencement for such benefits. *** As there is a lack of any evidence establishing the value placed on these pension benefits, we are hampered in our efforts to review the propriety of the court's division of that property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The trial court did not abuse its discretion ... when it is considered that the husband's concealment of assets may be taken into account in determining the property division.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.