Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 Ohio App. 3d 68 - MacArthy v. Dunfee

19 Ohio App. 3d 68 - MacArthy v. Dunfee’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2016

9 state decisions

401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · H. K. Porter Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Cross-Appellee · State v. Arthur Andersen & Co. · Merritt v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers · 2 Ohio App. 3d 300 - Bilikam v. Bilikam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “THE TRIAL COURT ERRED TO THE PREJUDICE OF [APPELLANT] BY REJECTING HIS DEMAND FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES AFTER GRANTING HIS MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO [CIV.R.37]. {¶ 17} In his second assignment of error, appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his request for attorney's fees regarding his motion to compel after granting the motion to compel. This Court disagrees. {¶ 18} The trial court also did not err by refusing to award appellant attorney's fees under Civ. R. 37(A)(4). When a party's motion to compel is granted, Civ. R. 37(A)(4) requires a court to award reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, to the moving party "unless the court finds that the opposition to the motion was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “require the party or deponent who opposed the motion or the party or attorney advising such conduct or both of them to pay to the moving party the reasonable expenses incurred[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.