State v. Mapes’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 146 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 157 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Lott (1990), State v. Smith (1997)
6 federal appellate · 146 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griffin v. California · United States v. Young · Lockett v. Ohio · State v. Jenkins · Johnson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 157 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the offender chooses to make a statement, he is subject to cross-examination only if he consents to make the statement under oath or affirmation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. DePew v. Anderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.