State v. Tamler’s Empirical Analysis
1890
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 1950 · most notably State v. Foot You (1893), State v. Robinson (1897)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kearney v. Snodgrass · Schile v. . Brokhahus · Kiler v. Kimbal · McGarrity v. Byington · State v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The exceptions should be negatived only when they are descriptive of the offense, or a necessary ingredient of its definition; but when they afford matter of excuse merely, they are matters of defense and therefore need not be negatived in the indictment.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Dobson · State v. Aplin““Nothing in this act shall be so construed as to apply in any manner to incorporated towns and cities of this state”: Laws 1889, p. 9, § 11.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Burroughs · State v. Aplin““The general rule on this subject is, that where the exception or proviso is stated in the enacting clause, it is necessary to negative them in order that the description of the offense may in all respects correspond with the statute; but where such exception or proviso is contained in another or subsequent section of the statute, it is a matter of defense and need not be negatived in the indictment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Burroughs
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.