19 Or. App. 265 - State v. Hammang’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"[T]he question of knowledge is one of fact. Being a question of fact initially passed upon by the trial court, it follows that the trial court must, if there is any factual dispute, hold an evidentiary hearing to determine the facts. And once the trial court has determined the factual question of prosecutorial knowledge, its finding should be subject to only limited review in this court under the doctrine of Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or. 485 , 443 P.2d 621 (1968)." 19 Or. App. at 269 .”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Smith · 25 Or. App. 621 - State v. Sprague

2. “Thus, our inquiry is directed to whether the prosecution knew or should have known of the facts relevant to the murder charge on August 3, 1973, the date defendant plead guilty to theft.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Smith

3. “were known or reasonably should have been known to the prosecution within the meaning of the double-jeopardy rule of State v. Brown, 262 Or. 442 , 497 P.2d 1191 (1972).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Knowles