Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 Or. App. 770 - Tatum v. Clackamas County

19 Or. App. 770 - Tatum v. Clackamas County’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1976
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty. · State v. Port of Astoria · State v. Hodges · Schubel v. Olcott · Rose v. Port of Portland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The people of every county are hereby authorized to enact, amend or repeal all local laws for their county by initiative and referendum process. The method of procedure in the use by the people of any county of these powers is provided by sections 3470 to 3485 of Lord's Oregon laws, and amendments thereof, making effective the initiative and referendum powers reserved to the people by sections 1 and 1-a of article IV of the constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"The initiative and referendum powers reserved to the people by subsections (2) and (3) of this section are further reserved to the qualified voters of each municipality and district as to all local, special and municipal legislation of every character in or for their municipality or district. The manner of exercising those powers shall be provided by general laws * * *."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"`"* * * All zoning ordinances or amendments to zoning ordinances will originate by petition from, and vote thereon by, the persons affected by such proposed ordinance or amendment as provided by law and not otherwise. * * *"'" 33 Op.Att'y Gen. 481 (Or. 1966-68).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.