State v. Nemitz’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1865
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Powers v. Ohio · American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n v. United States Lines, Inc. · Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez · 117 Wash. 2d 263 - State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Here, there was no probative value to the information contained on the lawyer's car regarding appropriate constitutional rights. The only value of the card was its inference that only a person disposed to drink and drive would take anticipatory steps to avoid self-incrimination and to assert the right to counsel in the context of a DUI stop.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he inability to communicate because of a physical disability implicates policies that are different from those implicated by a juror's inability to communicate in English.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Marsh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.