Routh v. Andreassen’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 2019
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ogard v. Ogard · Hartland v. Hartland · Curley v. Curley · Adrian v. Adrian · Dewey v. Dewey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] modification of a [child] support order may be obtained only where there has been a material and substantial change in circumstances occurring subsequent to the original order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schwier v. Schwier“The superior court's factual findings regarding ... net income are subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fernau v. Rowdon“[TJrial courts must take all evidence necessary to accurately reflect the parties' economic reality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ward v. Urling
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.