Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 P3D 593 - Routh v. Andreassen

Routh v. Andreassen’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ogard v. Ogard · Hartland v. Hartland · Curley v. Curley · Adrian v. Adrian · Dewey v. Dewey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] modification of a [child] support order may be obtained only where there has been a material and substantial change in circumstances occurring subsequent to the original order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The superior court's factual findings regarding ... net income are subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[TJrial courts must take all evidence necessary to accurately reflect the parties' economic reality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.