Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 PACOMMW 83 - Fritsch v. Wohlgemuth

Fritsch v. Wohlgemuth’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1999
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · New York State Department of Social Services v. Dublino · Stottlemyer v. Stottlemyer · 348 F. Supp. 290 - Dublino v. New York State Department of Social Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [A] State does not violate the Equal Protection Clause merely because the classifications made by its laws are imperfect. If the classification has some ‘reasonable basis,’ it does not offend the Constitution simply because the classification ... in practice ... results in some inequality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.