Cady v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis
1895
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 6 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 1963 · most notably The Children's Bootery v. Sutker (1926), Shaver v. Heller & Merz Co. (1901)
12 federal appellate · 6 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sanders v. Jacob · Sanders v. Utt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But we think the use of the words ‘U. S. Dental Rooms’, and the use of the letters ‘U. S,’ upon the windows of the defendant’s office, is a plain attempt to convey the idea that the business carried on there is a branch of the complainant’s business and should be restrained.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““In all such cases, it is obvious, as defendant urges, that the effect of imitation depends upon propinquity.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tanenbaum v. Gay
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.