Gardner v. Haines’s Empirical Analysis
1905
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1934
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kellogg v. Douglas County Bank · Bennett v. Minott · Sandwich Manufacturing Co. v. Max · Jewett v. Downs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““During the year that Haines (the debtor) held the capital stock of the corporation his stock was subject to seizure or attachment upon execution, the same as would have been his stock of merchandise; hence the creditors of Haines were neither hindered nor delayed by the transfer of * * * merchandise to the corporation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Braus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.