Schultz v. Gund’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1977
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Berger v. Quintero · 18 La. App. 697 - Meyers v. Acme Homestead Ass'n · Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. Farnsworth & Co. · Aronson v. Pailet · Henry v. Swan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Before we consider the question of damages sustained by plaintiff, we notice a point which has been raised by the defendant, Gund, and his surety. It is contended in their behalf that, since the bid of the Holzer Company was received by Mr. Sporl, the architect, and the heating system installed directly by the Holzer Company and not under the supervision of the contractor, the latter is not responsible. We cannot see any force whatever in this contention. Gund made a contract with the plaintiff to erect his residence in accordance with certain plans and specifications; these plans and specifications provided for a heating system; Gund was paid for the installation of this system and is therefore responsible for the damages sustained under the building contract. The fact that he permitted the architect to deal directly with the subcontractor is unavailing to him as a defense."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The above system is to be guaranteed to keep the building at 70 F. dry bulb temperature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.