Rayson v. Beck’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1974
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pittman v. Bourg · Tedford v. Emison · Moore v. Hamilton · 16 La. App. 387 - Glass v. Stewart · White v. Sheriff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this case we are dealing not with the execution of contracts, but with incidents of actual disturbance, of which incidents this plaintiff had knowledge and certainly should have had realization that they constituted a challenge to her dominion and a disturbance to her possession.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the realization that his dominion is being seriously challenged . That is not accomplished by the execution of contracts to which he is a stranger.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.