Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 SO3D 1155 - Roberts v. Stidham

Roberts v. Stidham’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 621 So. 2d 451 - Carlton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. · 924 So. 2d 37 - Brown v. State · Kohler v. Vega-Maltes · Bacchi v. Manna of Hernando, Inc. · Carroll v. Florida Department of Corrections

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 1.070(j) is designed to be a case management tool, not an additional statute of limitations cutting off the liability of a tortfeasor, and it is not to be imposed inflexibly when the plaintiff demonstrates diligence and good cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.