Pilgrim v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Davis v. Washington · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · 437 So. 2d 19 - Box v. State · 805 So. 2d 452 - Simmons v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“withheld from him until later at trial. However, he concedes that there was no actual proof that the evidence was withheld, but it appears to be a huge coincidence. Further, Cruse asserts that this report would not have impacted the case one way or another. Accordingly, we find this issue without merit. B. Motion for a Continuance ¶ 21. Cruse argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for continuance. Cruse requested that the trial court allow time to investigate Ivy's other allegations of sexual assaults.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The decision to grant or deny a motion for a continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be grounds for reversal unless shown to have resulted in manifest injustice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reversal on the grounds of a trial court's denial of a motion for continuance requires a showing that the trial court's decision resulted in a manifest injustice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.