Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 So. 3d 26 - COTTINGIM v. Vliet

19 So. 3d 26 - COTTINGIM v. Vliet’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cormier v. Comeaux · 15 So. 3d 1128 - Watters v. Department of Social Services · 766 So. 2d 595 - Rogers v. Horseshoe Entertainment · 335 So. 2d 37 - Rebman v. Reed · Davis v. Oaklawn, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall be thirty days from the date estimated costs are paid if there is no testimony to be transcribed and lodged with the record and forty-five days from the date such costs are paid if there is testimony to be transcribed, unless the trial judge fixes a lesser period. The trial court may grant only one extension of the return day and such extension shall not be more than thirty days. A copy of the extension shall be filed with the appellate court. Subsequent extensions of the return day may be granted by the appellate court for sufficient cause or at the request of the court reporter as provided in Article 2127.2.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.