Wright v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 676 So. 2d 1322 - Ex Parte Bryowsky · 477 So. 2d 445 - Brannon v. Brannon · Welch v. Welch · Ex Parte Elliott · Willing v. Willing
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'When the parties' combined income exceeds the uppermost limit of the child-support schedule, the determination of a child-support obligation is within the trial court's discretion. Floyd v. Abercrombie , 816 So.2d 1051 , 1057 (Ala. Civ. App. 2001) ; Dyas v. Dyas , 683 So.2d 971 (Ala. Civ. App. 1995).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. White v. White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.