Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 SW2D 421 - Dyer v. Johnson

Dyer v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2003

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

40192919301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cole v. Cunningham · William M'Elmoyle for the Use of Isaac Bailey v. John J Cohen · Embry v. Palmer · Overton v. Blum · Harn v. Phelps

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think that the Texas authorities hold that a judgment entered by a sister state, sued on in this state may be set aside for fraud in the obtaining of the judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.