Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 SW2D 578 - Burns v. Napier

Burns v. Napier’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1955
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pearson v. West · Taylor v. Wilson · Russell v. Green · Brown v. Boulden · 22 Tex. Civ. App. 483 - Jackson v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““First Counterpoint “Subdivision 3 of the Venue Statute, Article 1995, permitting suit against a nonresident defendant in the county of plain tiff’s residence, does not deprive appellee, a resident named as a co-defendant, of his right to be sued in the county of his residence. “Second Counterpoint “Appellee’s plea of privilege must be sustained because of the failure of appellant to introduce any evidence upon venue facts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.