Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 S.W.3d 160

Morant v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 2000

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2000-05-30

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2004

9 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-05-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Tyrone DeSante Morant (Movant) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/19/sw3d/160 · .json · Public domain