Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 Tex. Ct. App. 46

Ex Parte Wood

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 14, 1885

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1885-10-14

Habeas Corpus on appeal from the District Court of Nolan. Tried below before the Hon. William Kennedy. This is the companion case to the preceding one of Ex parte Boyett, the indictment charging the same offense. Upon the same state of facts testified to by the same witnesses who were examined in Bovett’s case, bail was refused this applicant and he was remanded to the custody of the sheriff.

Decided 1885-10-14

Hurt, Judge.

¶2By the proper affidavit of the sheriff of Nolan county, who held appellant in custody, it appears that Wood escaped on the 5th day of July, 1885, pending his appeal to this court. On the 8th day of July, Wood, about thirty miles from the county seat of Nolan county, was arrested and placed in jail, and is now in custody.

¶3Based upon these facts relative to the escape, the assistant attorney-general moves that the appeal be dismissed.

¶4Appellant being charged by indictment with murder, a felony, and the honorable district judge who heard the writ having refused *48bail, the inference is that this is an appeal in a felony case. Being an appeal in a felony case, the provisions of article 845, Code Criminal Procedure, apply. Said article reads: “In case the defendant, pending an appeal in a felony case, shall make his escape from custody, the -jurisdiction of the court of appeals shall no longer attach in the case; and upon the fact of such escape being made to appear, the court shall, on motion of the attorney-general, or attorney representing the State, dismiss the appeal; but the order dismissing the appeal shall be set aside if it shall be made to appear that the accused had voluntarily returned to the custody of the officer from whom he escaped, within ten days.”

¶5It wiU be noted that this article is not confined or limited to appeals in felony cases in which the defendant has been tried and convicted; but is applicable to all appeals in felony cases. The only question, therefore, is, is this an appeal in a felony case? We are of the opinion that it is, and, hence, governed by article 845.

¶6We are of the opinion that the motion should be sustained, and the appeal dismissed; it is therefore ordered accordingly.

¶7Appeal dismissed.

¶8[Opinion delivered October 14, 1885.]

/19/texctapp/46 · .json · Public domain