Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 U.S. 598 - M'Clung v. Silliman

M'Clung v. Silliman’s Empirical Analysis

19 U.S. 598 · 1821

Citation profile

138
cited by 138 later decisions
35
cited 35 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 8 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 138 later decisions (35 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984), United State v. Morgan (1954)

33 federal appellate · 8 district · 15 state decisions

170182118301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McIntire v. Wood · M'Cluny v. Silliman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fourteenth section of the act under consideration could only have been intended to vest the power now contended for in cases where the jurisdiction already exists, and not where it is to be courted or acquired, by means of the writ proposed to be sued out.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The question before an appellate Court is, was the judgment correct, not the ground on which the judgment professes to proceed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “not specifically provided for by statute”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.