Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 Va. App. 300 - Commonwealth v. Ramey

19 Va. App. 300 - Commonwealth v. Ramey’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2015

10 state decisions

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Texas v. Brown · City of New Orleans v. Dukes · Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia · Fiamengo v. San Francisco · Smyth v. Godwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to protect a criminal defendant from being twice put in jeopardy for the same offense, the Commonwealth is prohibited from appealing a judgment in a criminal prosecution. However, this prohibition, if applied without exception, would deny review of erroneous trial court decisions suppressing evidence found to have been obtained in violation of the United States Constitution. These decisions involve significant constitutional protection and often determine the outcome of a criminal proceeding. Appellate review serves to enhance the uniformity and legitimacy of such decisions. Providing appellate review of these decisions, therefore, serves a legitimate governmental objective. Furthermore, because of its interlocutory nature, it does so while still preserving a criminal defendant’s protection against being twice placed in jeopardy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.