Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 Va. App. 437 - Logan v. Commonwealth

19 Va. App. 437 - Logan v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 44 Va. App. 741 - Thomas v. Commonwealth (2005), 28 Va. App. 20 - Welshman v. Commonwealth (1998)

62 state decisions

260199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Sokolow · Michigan v. Summers · Higginbotham v. Commonwealth · 4 Va. App. 438 - Martin v. Commonwealth · 4 Va. App. 53 - Williams v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the commonsense 'relationship between the distribution of controlled substances ... and the possession and use of dangerous weapons'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “evidence of acts, statements, or conduct of the accused or other facts or circumstances which tend to show that the defendant was aware of both the presence and the character of the substance and that it was subject to his dominion and control.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]e agree with the Commonwealth that if a broken window is suggestive of a prior theft, it is just as suggestive of what the officers suspected it might be in this case, a theft in progress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.