Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 Va. App. 744 - Werres v. Commonwealth

19 Va. App. 744 - Werres v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2013

8 state decisions

40199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Higginbotham v. Commonwealth · 14 Va. App. 836 - Branch v. Commonwealth · Graybeal v. Commonwealth · 18 Va. App. 293 - Wilkins v. Commonwealth · Dale v. City of Newport News

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The term “imitation controlled substance" when used in this article means (i) a counterfeit controlled substance or (ii) a pill, capsule, tablet, or substance in any form whatsoever which is not a controlled substance subject to abuse, and: 1. Which by overall dosage unit appearance, including color, shape, size, marking and packaging or by representations made, would cause the likelihood that such a pill, capsule, tablet, or substance in any other form whatsoever will be mistaken for a controlled substance unless such substance was introduced into commerce prior to the initial introduction into commerce of the controlled substance which it is alleged to imitate; or 2. Which by express or implied representations purports to act like a controlled substance as a stimulant or depressant of the central nervous system and which is not commonly used or recognized for use in that particular formulation for any purpose other than for such stimulant or depressant effect, unless marketed, promoted, or sold as permitted by the United States Food and Drug Administration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a pill, capsule, tablet, or substance in any form whatsoever which is not a controlled substance subject to abuse, and ... [w]hich by overall dosage unit appearance, including color, shape, size, marking and packaging or by representations made, would cause the likelihood that such a pill, capsule, tablet, or substance in any other form whatsoever will be mistaken for a controlled substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “By its nature, an imitation controlled substance has little or no use other than its commercial value in being misrepresented and sold as a controlled substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.