19 Wash. App. 23 - State v. McKinney’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2010
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 4 Wash. App. 103 - State v. Carter · 74 Wash. 2d 828 - State v. Hardwick · 57 Wash. 2d 383 - State v. Harris · 79 Wash. 2d 647 - State v. Canaday
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) The defense of duress is not available if the crime charged is murder or manslaughter.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“One who intentionally or recklessly places himself in a situation in which it is probable that he will be subject to duress is not afforded the defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Healy“(4) The defense of duress is not established solely by a showing that a married person acted on the command of his or her spouse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.