Rea v. Rea’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
July 1994
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Biddel v. Brizzolara · Southern Pacific Co. v. Prosser · Hargis v. Sewell's Administrator · 13 Wash. 2d 182 - Cannavina v. Poston · 5 Cal. App. 562 - Visher v. Wilbur
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract whereby to take the case out of the operation of this chapter, unless it is contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby . . .”. 3 Long argues that the 1985 deed of trust was not an acknowledgment because it stated it was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.