Mitchell v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1980
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Beal & Doyle Dry Goods Co. v. Barton · Starling v. Hamner · Lesser-Goldman Cotton Co. v. Merchants' & Planters' Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . to constitute, usury, there must be an agreement requiring the borrower to pay and entitling the lender to receive a higher rate of interest than that allowed by statute for the loan or forbearance of money.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haley v. Greenhaw
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.